Limbaugh and Imus – Different Strokes
by
Paul R. Hollrah
April 10,2007
Just for a moment, let’s take a little trip back in time to ESPN’s Sunday
NFL Countdown on September 28, 2003. Hosted by ESPN sportscaster Chris
Berman, the show also featured expert commentary by Steve Young, former all-pro
quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers; Tom Jackson, former all-pro linebacker
for the Denver Broncos; Michael Irvin, former all-pro wide receiver for the
Dallas Cowboys; and Rush Limbaugh, America’s top conservative talk radio host
and a dedicated and knowledgeable football fan.
As the discussion turned to the performance of some key NFL players,
particularly Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, Limbaugh commented,
“I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The
media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a
little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance
of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team.”
The truth is, McNabb does not give 100% effort on every play of every game,
and never has.
As a quarterback, he has a tendency to “loaf” a
bit. Limbaugh was only making a judgment that is shared by many thousands
of diehard Eagles fans, this writer included. McNabb is simply not the
quarterback that many in the media make him out to be.
But Limbaugh wasn’t alone in his assessment. Young, who happens to be
white, commented that McNabb “certainly hasn’t matured,” while Michael Irvin,
who is black, said, not once but twice, “Rush has a point… Rush has a
point.”
So Limbaugh did not make an unfair or a racist comment about McNabb and he
was not alone in his assessment. He commented, accurately, that the media
doesn’t always portray the Eagles’ quarterback fairly and accurately. But
we wouldn’t have known that from the anti-Limbaugh reaction in the days that
followed... a media firestorm that resulted in Limbaugh’s resignation.
Then-Democratic presidential candidate, Gen. Wesley Clark, said, “Mr.
Limbaugh should be fired immediately.”
Another Democratic presidential contender, Governor Howard Dean urged ESPN
to fire Limbaugh.
Reverend Al Sharpton, who should know a racist comment when
he sees one, said, “I'm going to call for ESPN to terminate Rush Limbaugh
…”
The NAACP condemned Limbaugh's remarks, calling them “bigoted and
ignorant.”
In covering Limbaugh’s speech before the National Association of
Broadcasters several days later, CNN reported that, while Limbaugh expressed
regret over the McNabb comments, he failed to directly address questions about
his name being linked… “to an investigation into a black market drug ring in
Palm Beach County, Florida.”
Now, compare Limbaugh’s fate to that of TV-radio “shock jock” Don Imus, who
last week referred to the mostly black Rutgers University girls’ basketball team
as being “nappy-headed hos...” (“hos” being the pejorative term for “whores”
widely used in rap and hip-hop “music” genres to describe young black
females.)
CBS Radio, Imus’s chief employer, announced that, rather than fire him,
they would take him off the air for two weeks.
Reverend Al Sharpton, being entirely consistent, said the remarks were
“repugnant, repulsive, and horrible” and called for Imus to be fired.
But other liberals, those who would have joined in condemning Rush Limbaugh
for a racist comment that was not a racist comment, quickly came to Imus’s
defense.
David Rosenthal, publisher of Simon and Shuster, said that Imus has been “a
fantastic forum for authors and for people with interesting ideas” and that it
would be a shame if he was fired.
Rosie O’Donnell, liberalism’s biggest and loudest mouth, said, “Imus should
be judged on his forty year career, not on just four words.”
The unfunny liberal comedian, Bill Maher, who makes a living spouting
anti-conservative, anti- Bush hate speech; Boston Globe columnist Tom Oliphant;
and journalist Jeff Greenfield wasted no time in going on the air with Imus to
offer words of encouragement and support.
But it was left to Niger Innis, Chairman of the Congress of Racial
Equality (CORE), an old line black civil rights organization, to put a bit of
perspective on the issue. While agreeing that Imus’s racist and sexist
outburst was reprehensible and that severe punishment was in order, Innis said,
“Don Imus only borrowed for a day what black “gangsta” rappers and hip-hop
artists say every day.”
No one should excuse Imus for his incredibly insensitive choice of words,
but those in the black community who condemn him should be looking into their
mirrors and asking themselves what they’ve done to eradicate the unspeakable
poison of rap “music” from our culture. If every black male child in
America is subjected to song lyrics dozens of times a day that refer to their
sisters and their female classmates as “hos,” why should they be surprised when
a white “shock jock” like Don Imus, whose gets paid big bucks for saying
outrageous things, inadvertently lets one slip?