|
|
by Techniguy | Dec. 16, 2006
Fox News has always been considered a conservative
news network but remember their motto is "Fair and Balanced".
What that means is that Fox presents more of the conservative view
than the other networks do, along with the views of the Left which
dominate the other networks. Perhaps it is only our
perception that Fox News is conservative because they present the
conservative view as well as the liberal which most media news
doesn't. We see that and therefore conclude that Fox is a
conservative news network when all it is trying to do is to be "fair
and balanced".
Program hosts on Fox are usually considered more
conservative than those we see on other networks which is a
refreshing change, but the hosts are not the only persons who
provide the news stories. They have their writers and
producers, many of whom are more of the Left persuasion.
Program hosts are not at liberty to pick and choose what stories
they broadcast, that is dictated by the management and
producers.
Many viewers seem to be noticing a change in Fox News and an
apparent shift to the Left. The shifts in Fox have not been
sudden, they've been developing over the past couple of years.
There is no one thing responsible for it, it's really a
combination of several factors. Much of it has to do with the
political climate of the country and international politics.
Remember, Fox News is a subsidiary of News Corp. which is an
international corporation created by Rupert Murdoch of Australia who
relocated to the USA some 30 years ago.
Murdoch is basically a natural conservative but is more
interested in his business interests than he is in his political
interests. He will support whoever is in power and go with the
political climate of the country. If he thinks Hillary might
become the next president, for example, he will support her.
Anyway, he has for several years had a friendly relationship with
the Clintons ever since Bill Clinton insisted on meeting with
Murdoch and doing everything he could to get on his good side, it
worked. The Clintons need Murdoch more than he needs
them and they have been doing everything they can to buddy
up to him for obvious reasons. To Murdoch, it's just good for
business.
Murdoch is a political independent and will support the
party or candidate that will most benefit his business.
Understand that Murdoch is above domestic politics in his
international interests. He could probably care less which
political party is in power in America, it won't have much effect on
him or his corporation. What concerns him more is having his
friends in power and the Clintons are now his friends.
Granted, he should choose his friends more carefully.
The media likes amateur politician, Barack Mohammed Obama, and
has been giving him lots of attention and promotions. It's
understandable that they never mention his Arab Islamic roots and
he, so far, hasn't asked to be sworn into office on the Koran.
What ever the mainstream media covers, Fox feels an obligation to
cover as well, for some unknown reason, but when ever they cover the
"media created" Obama story, they always give equal time to
"Hellary" Clinton. Murdoch has even been giving fundraiser
dinners for Clinton and her campaigns. Things could change,
but for now, Clinton is Murdoch's choice for 2008. Needless to
say, Fox News is loosing viewers from much of their
programming.
Murdoch's News Corporation is also not without it's liberal
influences and Murdoch himself seems vulnerable to their views and
ideas. Peter Chernin is President and Chief Operating Officer
of News Corporation, and Chairman and CEO of the Fox Group. As
one news media profile put it, "he is as famously liberal as his
boss (Rupert Murdoch, CEO of News Corporation) is
conservative." Murdoch's son, James Murdoch, is becoming more
active in the business and he is also a far
left liberal. What it comes down to is that Rupert
Murdoch is easily swayed by those nearest to him and many of those
who have close access to him are liberals.
For example, In trying to explain his backing for
Harold Ford (D), Murdoch, at the October 20 News Corporation
annual meeting stated that "one of our senior executives at Fox
is a friend of would-be Senator Ford and brought him in and tried to
convince me how conservative he was." It was apparently convincing
enough because Murdoch and Chernin, a top Democratic Party
fundraiser, both contributed to the Ford for Senate campaign. Both
also made contributions to Senator Clinton's campaign.
Murdoch, this year, donated $4200 to the Clinton campaign while
the second highest recipient of Murdoch's political contributions
was David Dreier (R-CA), but Ford got only $300 from
him. Murdoch's New York Post newspaper endorsed Hillary for
Senate over her conservative opponent John Spencer, not for her
political views, but because of their friendship and business
interests. Murdoch himself is conservative but not exclusively
nor committed to conservative causes.
Son, James Murdoch, a card carrying member of Al Gore's Global
Warming Club, has also convinced his father to support the junk
science of man-made global warming and thus we got Robert Kennedy
Jr.'s global warming program on Fox News last year, and Murdoch has
been contributing money to environmental groups. He's a
conservative on many things including support for the war in
Iraq, reduction of government and taxes, but has succumbed
to the liberal views on some other things because of the influence
of those closest to him. His politics change with the
direction of the political wind. His News Corporation is
a global enterprise and he is just as connected with British
and Australian politicians as he is with American
politicians.
As of August 2005 the Murdoch family owns about 29% of the
company. Nearly all of these shares are voting shares, and Rupert
Murdoch retains effective control of the company. Nonetheless John
Malone of Liberty Media has built up a larger stake of 32%, but only
around half of these shares are voting shares. Saudi prince Alwaleed
bin Talal al Saud who is an investing tycoon and chairman of the
Kingdom Holding Company said in an interview with Charlie Rose that
he had about a 6-7% stake in News Corp.
Although John Malone is conservative, Murdoch has been at war
with him for the past two years over control of News Corp which
Murdoch wanted to retain within his family. In late November,
2006, Murdoch bought out Malone's News Corp shares at a cost of over
2 billion dollars and turned control of Directv over to Liberty
Media which had been a News Corp. property since he bought it
from Hughes Corp. Directv now belongs to John Malone and
Liberty Media.
It's also interesting to note that of the total political
contributions of News Corporation's management and employees, more
money has gone to Democrat candidates than has to Republicans.
Over the past 8 years, News Corp. has contributed $389,016.00 to
political campaigns. Of that, $137,480 (35% of total) was
given to Republicans, while $143,851 (37% of total) was given to
Democrats. Many of these contributors work at Fox News.
At Fox News, Roger Ailes is the staunch conservative who put
Fox News on cable and directed the hiring of most of the
personnel which originally reflected his conservative views,
but there have been personnel changes and he too has his
problems with liberals. Although Fox News is sometimes accused
of being biased for conservatives, it has far more liberals than any
other news station has conservatives, and this doesn't include the
producers:
Alan Colmes Ellis Henican Chris Wallace, a life
long Democrat who hosts Fox News Sunday Greta Van Susteren
Rich Masters, formerly from Canada's liberal CTV news network
Kirstin Powers, former member of the administration of
President Bill Clinton Jane Hall, a regular contributor to Fox
News Watch Juan Williams from the taxpayer-funded NPR
Susan Estrich, a former member of the Michael Dukasis campaign
Bob Beckel, a Democrat strategist Elaine Kamarck, former
Al Gore campaign manager Shepard Smith Mort Kondracke, a
life long Democrat voter Bill Hemmer, a former anchor on CNN
Dick Morris, a former advisor for President Bill Clinton
Neil Gabler, a regular on Fox News Watch Laura Schwartz, a
Democrat strategist and former advisor to President Bill Clinton
With such a diversified lineup of diverse opinions, it is
difficult for critics to explain why Fox News is allegedly
biased--considering that other new channels have - if any - only one
or two token conservatives. The public seems to agree, as Fox News
has dominated the cable news industry--at times having higher
ratings than CNN, CNN Headline News, MSNBC, and CNBC -
combined. (Wikipedia.com)
When liberals make the claim that Fox News is "Right bias", they
are, as usual, making false claims without checking the facts.
They simply do not understand that it's the rest of the media is
Left bias and they are shocked to suddenly be confronted in the
media by views that do not agree with their own as they are so used
to seeing.
So when you're watching Fox News, don't expect what you see to
always be the conservative view. Fox does report the
conservative view, but it also includes the liberal views
of the rest of the mainstream media. That's what they mean by
"fair and balanced".
We tend to look to Fox News to counter the left bias of the rest
of the news media but that's not the way it is in reality.
There is, in fact, no news service that can counterbalance the left
media other than conservative talk radio and the "New Media" of the
internet. As for Fox News, they are at best 50/50. News
Corp. and Fox News management are primarily interested in one thing
- profit. They will air whatever brings in the most
viewers. They know they already have the conservatives as
there is no place else for them to go. If they can appeal to
liberals as well, then that is what they will try to do. Their
agenda is not political, it is profit motivated and that is the
American way. We just have to take the good with the bad on
Fox, what else can we do?
It would be nice to have a real conservative news station but
don't hold your breath, liberals own the media. Rupert Murdoch
and Roger Ailes are fortunate to have gotten as far as they have
with Fox News. If they were any more conservative, some
liberal judge would order that they offer "equal time" to
liberals. If that didn't work, New York liberal protesters
would destroy the studio under the banner of "free speech".
The problem has gotten worse.
At the annual meeting of News Corporation, parent of
Fox News, chairman Rupert Murdoch confirmed that a call from a Saudi
Prince had resulted in a change in how the Fox News Channel covered
the Muslim riots in France in 2005. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, a
significant investor in News Corporation, told Murdoch he objected
to highlighting the Muslim role in the riots. Murdoch said the
change was made after it was determined that there was a Catholic
role in the riots.
This is strange, to say the least. I had never heard
or seen it reported anywhere that there was a Catholic role in the
riots.
In an October 25 editorial, "Europe's Muslims," the
Washington Post noted that, "A year ago this week, riots
erupted in mostly Muslim suburbs of Paris and other French
cities…" (emphasis added).
I went back a year ago, looking at various reports of
the riots. Molly Moore of the Post on November 5, 2005, reported
that, "Much of the rioting has occurred in areas heavily
populated by poor African Muslim immigrants…"
(emphasis added).
Murdoch told me that the call from the Saudi Prince
resulted in an investigation that resulted in the change of
coverage. At the time, however, Claire Cozens of the Guardian
reported that Alwaleed had claimed that the coverage was changed
very quickly.
"I picked up the phone and called Murdoch and said
that I was speaking not as a shareholder, but as a viewer of Fox. I
said that these are not Muslim riots, they are riots," the prince
reportedly said. "He [Murdoch] investigated the matter and called
Fox and within half an hour it was changed from 'Muslim riots' to
'civil riots.'"
The problem has gotten worse. Again, to quote from the
October 25, 2006, editorial: "French police are facing what some
call a 'permanent intifada' in Muslim neighborhoods, with nearly
2,500 incidents of violence against officers recorded in the first
six months of the year. Some of these now take the form of planned
ambushes: on Sunday a gang of youths emptied a bus of its
passengers, set it on fire, and then stoned the firefighters who
responded."
It looks like the Muslim riots are continuing. Will
Fox News cover them accurately and objectively at the risk of
another phone call from the Prince?
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF
RUPERT MURDOCH 2005-2006
|
|
Contributor |
Occupation |
Date |
Amount |
Recipient |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10022 |
MEDIA/CHAIRMAN |
6/12/2006 |
$2,100 |
Dreier, David (R) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10036 |
NEWS CORPORATION/CHAIRMAN/CEO |
7/26/2006 |
$2,100 |
Clinton, Hillary (D) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10036 |
NEWS CORPORATION/CHAIRMAN/CEO |
7/26/2006 |
$2,100 |
Clinton, Hillary (D) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10036 |
NEWS AMERICA INCORPORATED/CHAIRMAN |
12/13/2005 |
$2,000 |
Sununu, John E (R) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10036 |
NEWS CORPORATION |
6/20/2005 |
$2,000 |
McConnell, Mitch (R) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10036 |
NEWS CORPORATION/CHAIRMAN |
12/20/2005 |
$2,000 |
Stevens, Ted (R) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10036 |
NEWS CORPORATION/CHAIRMAN |
12/20/2005 |
$2,000 |
Stevens, Ted (R) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10036 |
NEWS CORPORATION/CEO |
5/22/2006 |
$1,000 |
Reynolds, Tom (R) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT NEW
YORK,NY 10043 |
NEWS CORPORATION/CHAIRMAN AND CEO |
6/14/2005 |
$1,000 |
Longhorn PAC (R) |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT LOS
ANGELES,CA 90064 |
FOX, INC. |
6/14/2006 |
$800 |
National Rep. Sen. Cmte |
|
MURDOCH, RUPERT BEVERLY
HILLS,CA 90210 |
NEWS CORPORATION/MEDIA EXEC. |
4/25/2006 |
$300 |
Ford, Harold E Jr
(D) |
'OpenSecrets' Donor Lookup comprises
contribution data available electronically from the Federal
Election
Commission. |
|
|
PLEASE do not use Techniguy's Newsletter email
addresses in group mailing lists.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is
distributed under fair use without profit or payment for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
| |
| |