May 12, 2007
Republicans in Congress have been accused of corruption for taking bribes
and allowing lobbyist Jack Abramoff to influence legislation. Whatever influence
Abramoff may have had on Republican legislators is nothing compared to the
influence George Soros is having on Democrat legislators. In both cases, votes
were and are being bought for money.
Speaking of buying votes for money, how does $24 Billion sound. That is the
cost to taxpayers for pork that Nancy Pelosi is offering her Democrats in
exchange for votes on her Iraq Surrender Bill. But it isn’t just Pelosi who
wants a US surrender in Iraq, it’s also her boss and dictator of the Democrat
Party, George Soros. This should serve as an example of Pelosi's loyalty and
dedication to her commander.
Soros doesn’t like wars, especially wars where Americans intend to win.
Pelosi’s counterpart in the Senate, Harry Reid, is consistent in promoting the
exact same rhetoric we hear from Pelosi but he isn’t quite as polished. He makes
mistakes with statements like “the war is lost” and in doing so, lets the cat
out of the bag on their agenda to weaken America.
Hillary Clinton wants her share of Soros money too. Not only does she want
to socialize the medical industry, but says she would “take the profits from the
oil companies” and give it to organizations of her own choosing. “From each
according to their ability, to each according to their need”. The basis for all
Marxist philosophy which Soros and Clinton share.
Then again, Clinton doesn’t really need too much of her money from Soros.
She has other sources of funding such as “under the table” contributions from
the Communist Chinese; unreported and under-reported private donations at
fundraisers in places like Hollywood; millions given to her husband for speeches
given and deals made in Mideastern countries; and if Sandy Berger can get away
with stealing top secret documents from the government, then what other kinds of
crime and fraud does Clinton profit from?
Remember, the Rose Law Firm investigation was halted with the firing of all
93 US Attorneys when the Clintons took over the White House and Air Force 1,
gutting both when they left. Then they figured a way to have the taxpayers pay
for their new estate home in New York. What else have they stolen from us that
we don‘t yet know about?
How can Mrs. Clinton run for President on her “credentials” when other than
being the former First Lady, her only credentials are a failed socialized
healthcare plan, bringing thousands of Islamics to America, and renaming a
couple of buildings in New York? It’s going to take more than lifelong training
in Marxism to get elected to the White House but Soros may have to settle for
that if Ms. Clinton wins the primaries.
Through his bought and paid for organizations like MoveOn.org, Daily KOS,
Media Matters, and countless other political action committees, Soros is
dictating his will to the Democrat party. MoveOn and Daily KOS have told
Democrat leaders in Congress that unless they pass the antiwar legislation
demanded by the far left, those organizations will end their support for the
Democrats in Congress. Without the support of these organizations, Democrats
will have not only lost the liberal votes, but the Soros campaign money as well.
MoveOn has in the past, and is now again boasting "We bought the Democrat
party, we own it, and we are taking it back". So who is "we"?
Quite simply, it is radical liberals funded by quasi-Communists George
Soros and Peter Lewis who the Democrat party has come to depend on for their
funding. They are in charge, they pay the bills, they provide the campaign
funding. They decide which democrats get elected and they decide the agenda for
the Democrats in Congress through their surrogate organizations.
They provide marching orders and propaganda through their primary internet
outlets MoveOn and Daily KOS which then spread into Congress and ultimately to
the New York Times, Washington Post, and the rest of the media centipede.
The Soros organizations start with donations to The Tides Foundation, owned
by Teresa Heinz Kerry which distributes hundreds of millions of Soros dollars to
the left wing political action organizations. They tried to put John Kerry in
the White House in 2004 and failed, now they want revenge on the American people
who voted against them.
Soros’ plan for America is raise taxes, cut defenses, open borders, corrupt
our schools with sex and socialist indoctrination, reject God and eliminate
religion, destroy the moral fiber, divide the country, and leave it vulnerable
to attack by foreign powers and terrorists. Is this not exactly what Democrats
are trying to do today in Congress? Is all this not completely contrary to what
America is and what it stands for?
The corruption in the Democrat party that allows Soros to buy votes and
dictate to Congressmen and Senators is 100 times worse than any influence Jack
Abramoff may have had on Republican politicians yet it goes unchallenged and
Abramoff’s influence only effected the direction in which a few dollars
were spent, while Soros' influence is effecting the direction of the whole
country through his bought and paid for politicians. Shouldn’t the Justice
Department be asking where Democrats are getting their campaign money?
Oh sure, it’s all reported in the public record as individual donors giving
up to the limit of $2100.00 each, but those records only reflect the final
donor. The question to be asked is “who are they, and where did they get the
money?” How much of that money came from Soros donations? Or start from the top
and work down; exactly where did all the donated hundreds of millions of Soros
money go? Don’t expect the House Ethics or Judiciary Committees to be
investigating this anytime soon.
After George W. Bush won the elections in 2000, Democrats demanded
"campaign reform". In 2002 we got McCain/Feingold "campaign reform" which opened
the door to privately funded and unaccountable 527 groups and uncontrolled
campaign registration and voter fraud. The $2100.00 limit didn't stop Soros from
giving hundreds of millions to private organizations like the Tides Foundation
to be distributed to radical left wing organizations and to ultimately be
contributed to political campaigns by thousands of individual donors doing Soros
Is it any coincidence that Politicians on the left have been promoting such
anti-American, Marxist rhetoric since 2004? Is their rhetoric any different from
the views and ambitions of George Soros? It appears now that leading Democrat
politicians are nothing more than mouthpieces for Soros and doing his bidding in
What Democrats are doing in Congress makes no sense at all from an American
point of view. But if you consider the Soros money factor, then it makes perfect
sense. Without the support of the Soros funded organizations, Democrats won't be
able to raise enough money to get themselves reelected. Their only hope of
holding onto their political careers is to fall in line with the shadow dictator
with the money.
Abramoff's activities involved the influencing of a handful of Republicans
votes on certain issues regarding funding for American Indian interests. Soros'
activities involve the influencing of the entire Democrat party and effect every
vote they cast on every issue that effects the lives of all Americans. Their
methods are different, but the crime and consequence is the same. In the best
interests of America, I'll take Abramoff over Soros anytime.
We may have lost a few tax dollars with Abramoff, we're loosing the entire
country with Soros.