Don’t Fall for the Well-Staged “Rift” Between Hillary and the Strident Left

By Rene Guerra

 

The GOP “nomenklatura” and its retinue of wobbly-knee, jelly-spine Republicans don’t stop rattling the Hillary boogeyman on our faces to compel us into supporting whom they keep trumpeting clangorously as the only GOP nominee that can beat her.

 

The GOP bosses are so scared of her that they gulp bottles of Imodium washed down with buckets of Pepto-Bismol to try to contain the result of their overwhelming fright.

 

They believe her unstoppable, thus swallowing the cud that the “mainstream” media regurgitate on them, day in day out. The cretins don’t pause to remember that the “mainstream” media are but an arm of the left and, consequently, boosters of leftist candidates. The leftists that the “mainstream” media are, they of course want a leftist elected President, and their best bet is on Hillary.

 

Toward that goal, the “mainstreamers” are attempting to portray her as centrist, based on a feigned, well-staged rift of hers with the vociferous sector of the left that “mainstreamers” deceitfully refer to as “the extreme left”. And to help the “mainstreamers” in their deceit amidst the presidential campaign, the vociferous left has premeditatedly become even more vociferous.

 

But, who could be more leftist than Hillary?

 

The reality is that Hillary and those around her are the extreme left, and the hysterically strident leftist in MoveOn, Media Matters, Code Pink, the Cindy Sheehan gang and other leftist political latrines, are mostly a decoy, playing a masterfully designed deception.

 

Not that they aren’t leftists. Alas, they are, and to the marrow. And they are doing their best in the current campaign to expose themselves as the ultra-extremists they are, for it plays better towards their ultimate design: distract us while they sneak Hillary getting elected President of the United States of America. But it’s mostly a cunning diversion.

 

They do their best to blatantly represent themselves as the worse evil in phony comparison to Hillay. They go to the extreme of portraying themselves as the true scary ones. They want to make the gullible swallow that they are the true leftists, and that Hillary is not that leftist after all, that she is not that threatening to America, that the true threat is them. They are trying to boo us with their bizarre stridency . . . while Hillary runs with the presidency tightly kept under her hairy armpit.

 

Nice trick!

 

While the boisterous left is, basically, not more than herds of noisy foot-soldier marionettes, it’s the leftist puppeteers of the kind of Hillary Clinton, George Soros, Rahm Emanuel, Lanny Davis, et al, the truly dangerous ones. Hillary is only pretending distancing from strident left buffoons, so to get elected, and then show her ugly fangs and claws once throned President. That woman represents to America a threat worse than, together, McGovern, Al Gore and John Kerry ever represented.

 

Thus, instead of throwing its support behind a “moderate” whom they stupidly think would steal votes from her, what the GOP bosses must do is restlessly and intensively splatter the true Hillary on the face of the common American to make him/her understand the predicament she means to our nation.

 

They should stop also boosting as our 2008 candidate a RINO who for sure will make straddlers go for the real thing: a leftist, portrayed as “moderate”, Hillary. A RINO in 2008 will make the GOP’s true base (conservatives, that is) to offer, at best, lukewarm support through the presidential campaign and, most likely, abstain on election day. As for me, I am not one of those Republicans who hold their nose to vote for a RINO; I wear a gasmask.

 

A RINO in 2008 means trouble for America, and for the GOP, and for the World.

 

The left doesn’t only want to gain back the Presidency in the U.S.A.; the left also wants to revive the rush to the left that the Bill Clinton ascent to the Presidency caused in most of the West.

 

The left is in panic after politicians not antagonistic to America became head of state in Germany, France and Canada. The international leftist gains of the Bill Clinton era are dwindling. The left’s only net gains are south of the border, where only Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador and Colombia are headed by non-leftists. Led by Fidel Castro, the rest of heads of state in the region are a comet-tail of leftists and leftistoids.

 

But gains in that region --in one direction or the other-- are geopolitically meaningless. Europe however is a different tune. Europe does matter, particularly now, when signs are visible of Vladimir Putin breaking out of his cocoon and morphing into a quasi-czar with aspirations to becoming a Vladimir the Great, if not the Terrible . . . with the more than 10,000 H bombs he carries under the arm.

 

There are signs that, after flirting with socialism and socialistoid policies that went out of control after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Western Europeans have grown tired of the doom and malaise that the ill experience has brought upon them. It seems that Western Europe is in the path to embracing free entrepreneurialism unabashedly, and abandoning socialism and socialistoid policies. IPOs are hot in London, Berlin, Brussels, Amsterdam, Madrid, etc. Socialized medicine is seen now as a horrible nightmare, after decades of it.

 

The domestic left in the U.S. expects that if Hillary wins, the left abroad will get fired up to regain waning laurels . . . which would come to bite us back . . .  again.

 

A Hillary’s victory would be disastrous to America, either directly or by boomerang; allowing it would be insane.

 

Stopping Hillary is crucial . . . and perfectly doable.

 

Firstly, the GOP’s must expose Hillary for what she really is: an extreme leftist posing as just pinkish and centrist. Among other things, she must be exposed as the unrepentant associate of the Marxist-Leninist Black Panthers of the late 1960s and early 1970s, and of avowed-Stalinist Robert Treuhaft. She must be exposed as never having repudiated such associations, which is a patent symbol of her true beliefs. It is not by mere coincidence that the Black Panthers were resuscitated less than a year ago in Oakland, CA, preemptively as a new, democratic entity, ostensibly away from Marxism-Leninism.

 

Secondly, the GOP must expose Hillary also as the vehicle to bring back to meander through the halls of the White House that cheap, vulgar scoundrel whom she keeps as her consort, the execrable rascal who spilled more than enough stain, not only on Monika’s blue dress, but on the Office of the Presidency. Much worse, she would bring back Bill Clinton, who sat in the Oval Office concocting his kinky trysts and infamous gropes while brooding al-Qaida into the monster that hatched on 9/11.

 

Hillary is the most vulnerable of the three Democrat leading candidates; if Obama and Edwards could have skeletons in their closets, Hillary for sure has a mass grave for closet.  She carries not just a trunk of political baggage, but a full boxcar filled to the roof with ideological and political manure. While Obama and Edwards might probably result being moving targets, Hillary is definitely a sitting duck, immobilized by her boxcar of political and ideological manure noosed around her neck. What a feast she will be!

 

What the GOP bosses must do is open that boxcar, wide open, so that Hillary’s manure avalanches out for all to smell and see. That’s what the GOP nomenklatura should do, instead of idiotically trembling at her, and dangling her on our heads, as a Damocles sword, to scare us into supporting a RINO for 2008.

 

The GOP must then follow in its political ads with the demolishing question: Is it that what America needs now?

 

But, thirdly, the GOP cannot stop there; the GOP base and brass must throw their support for the candidate among the three leading nominees that offers the most antipodal contrast to Hillary.

 

The GOP is the party of small government, fiscal restrain, and an overall strong America that unequivocally prevails over her enemies, particularly Islamofascism, throughout the world and, most distinctly, in Afghanistan and Iraq.

 

But the GOP is also the party of other virtuous attributes: the party of life, the trusted guardianship of the Second Amendment, the staunch protector of marriage uniquely and only as the union between two consenting adults of opposite sex, and the party whose base clamors for secure borders and a terminal halt to illegal immigration.

 

Thus, we, the base, along with the GOP hierarchy, must support the Republican candidate that explicitly and directly adheres, the most and best, to all those tenets. We should not fall, like dopy chumps, for the well-staged “rift” between Hillary and the strident left, and then end up supporting a losing RINO.