United States Constitution
Declaration of Independence
American Spectator
CNS News
Conservative Voice
Daley Times-Post
Defense Dept
Drudge Report
Fox News
Intelligence Summit
Iron Pony Express
Kook Alert
Mich News
National Review
New Media Journal
Patriot Post
Real Clear Politics
Renew America
Stars & Stripes
Ugly Puppy
Washington Times
World Net Daily
Immigration Counter
Captain's Quarters
Free Republic
Lit Green Footballs
Michelle Malkin
Power Line



Davie Crockett
(It's not yours to give)

Communist Goals for America
(It's happening now)

Nuclear Attack
(Be Prepared)

Story behind the
Star Spangled Banner

(6 Min. Audio)

The Redistribution Of Liberty PRINTER FRIENDLY
Posted: 05/26/08

The Redistribution Of Liberty
by JR Dieckmann

Just after 8:00 AM Friday morning in New York, a construction crane toppled from its 200 foot tower, crushed a portion of the penthouse across the street, and destroyed about half of the building's balconies on it's way to crashing to the ground. New York Mayor, Michael Bloomberg called the accident "unacceptable." “What has happened is unacceptable and intolerable,” he said.

A New York City councilman is proposing the shut down of all construction cranes in New York City and asking for legislation to deal with the problem. Councilman, Tony Avella stated: "Every crane operation in the city needs to be shut down at this point until it's fully inspected. We can't keep putting people in jeopardy. And what has to happen is some real legislation, not just talk about it..."

This statement came less than one hour after I was talking with a work associate and told him to watch and see just how long it takes for some grandstanding politician to propose legislation to address the crane accident. It didn't take long. The government’s response to every crisis is always the same. Pass more laws to further restrict the freedom and liberty of industry and the citizens.

Perhaps Avella is not aware that the crane was inspected just last weekend as the crew raised it. All cranes are inspected by construction safety inspectors during erection and raising by already existing law. Developers are already highly motivated to do everything they can to avoid such occurrences. They don’t like lawsuits and they don’t like high insurance premiums. You can’t legislate against accidents caused by unanticipated failures such as metal fatigue.

This was the second crane accident in NYC in less than 3 months. City Councilwoman Jessica Lappin, who represented the neighborhood affected by the March collapse, said: "People shouldn't live in fear walking near a construction site — and certainly shouldn't feel fear sitting in their living rooms."

I'm not sure there were many people feeling fear while sitting in their living rooms, but I would respect anyone's right to feel fear while walking under any construction site. It's not a safe place to be no matter how much government tries to legislate “safety.” People must already know that, since no one on the ground was hurt other than a couple of construction workers. Anyone who feels safe while walking under a construction crane is a fool, and Lappin’s statement is simply foolish.

Meanwhile, in California, some consider helium filled, metallic party balloons "unacceptable." The California legislature is considering a bill to ban the floating air bags on the grounds that they can come in contact with power lines, causing short circuits, which not only provide a very exciting electrical flash, but sometimes can cause circuit breakers on the power lines to trip, dropping power to homes and businesses in the area. Liberals in California want the government to ban them.

The liberals in San Francisco find plastic grocery bags unacceptable. The government passed a law to ban them without regard for the additional trees it‘s going to take to replace them with paper bags.

Some years ago, Tonka Trucks were considered "unacceptable" by politicians because of the threat of cuts from metal edges. They were banned by government and now must be made of soft plastic. Many other products have been banned or made “people proof” out of our government’s tendency to play mommy and daddy to its citizens.

Our politicians have also concluded that light bulbs are now "unacceptable" and we must replace them all with CFLs. But that is only because liberal politicians consider coal fired and nuclear power plants "unacceptable"

Automobiles that get less than 35 mpg are now also considered "unacceptable," simply because liberal politicians consider mining our own domestic oil resources "unacceptable." It doesn’t conform to environmentalists’ political correctness or comply with efforts to combat the hoax of global warming.

They want us to turn our heating thermostats down to 68 degrees and our cooling thermostats up to 78 degrees because living in your comfort zone is now considered "unacceptable." Demanding that our government allow energy producers to provide the energy needed by American citizens is also considered "unacceptable." They don’t want to hear it.

But all these things are dwarfed by the proposed Lieberman - Warner Cap and Trade Bill. Lieberman-Warner would embark Americans on an unprecedented and large-scale manipulation of the national economy that would depress economic growth and have both short- and long-term unintended consequences.  Lieberman-Warner's "cap-and-trade" will hamstring Americans for decades and severely restrict their freedom and liberty. This is totally unacceptable to 90% of the American people according to a recent survey conducted by Wilson Research Strategies for the National Center for Public Policy Research.

The crane falling in New York was an accident. The crane that fell 3 months ago was also an accident, in spite of the fact that all safety regulation and inspections were in place. In a perfect world, there would be no accidents. Cars wouldn’t crash into each other; airplanes wouldn’t fall from the skies; trains wouldn’t derail or crash; no one would die in a war; no one would ever get hurt or killed, and construction cranes wouldn‘t topple over.

But we don’t live in a perfect world and no government legislation can change that. But a perfect world is exactly what liberals think they can create by imposing more and more government regulations and laws to restrict our freedom and liberty, including our freedom to take risks and possibly injure ourselves. But isn’t that a politician’s answer to everything? Pass more laws.

Government regulations and law cannot produce a perfect world, but what they can do is infringe on the rights to freedom and liberty of the citizens. Every law enacted by government designed to protect one segment of the population, does so by infringing on the rights and freedom of another segment of the population.

Take, for example, California’s efforts to ban the party balloon. To protect neighborhood residents from the possible inconvenience of a temporary power failure, the government would take away the right of balloon manufacturers to produce that balloon and the right of the party goers to enjoy them.

In New York, some politicians want to deny developers the freedom to complete their projects on schedule and on budget by shutting down their operations while submitting them to more useless inspections and legislation that will do nothing to prevent the kind of crane accident we saw on Friday.

Laws intended to protect people from risk do so by infringing on the freedom of others. This is not to say that we don’t need safety regulations on industry; we do. But this must not lead to excessive legislation and restrictions on industry every time an accident occurs. Before grandstanding politicians start writing new laws to protect one segment of the population, they should consider how their intended legislation will steal freedoms away from other segments of the population.

There is no better example than the laws being passed allegedly to protect the planet from global warming. The freedom of Americans to maintain their standard of living; to drive the cars they want; to control their own thermostats; to use whatever light bulbs they want; and to enjoy all of the freedoms and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution are being seriously infringed upon to satisfy the desires of radical environmentalist groups who oppose industry and affordable energy sources.

Environmentalists have every right and freedom to live the way they want to. They have no right to impose their will and lifestyle on others as they are now doing with the help of a liberal congress and government regulations. The rights and liberty of the majority of Americans are being stolen by government and given to the few to appease their distorted and irrational belief in global warming.

Likewise, the rights and liberty of Christians to freely speak and demonstrate their religious beliefs in public are being stolen by government and given to Muslims who seem to be offended by anything that does not support Islam.

In education, the rights and liberty of parents to raise their children with proper and moral values are being stolen by government and given to public school educators with quite different sets of values. Government wants to raise your child in their image, not yours, and your only recourse is to remove your child from public schools.

What I find unacceptable are morons like Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and a long list of others being allowed to make laws for the rest of us to live by. The kind of overbearing government we see today was never intended by the founders of our country and framers of our Constitution. They very explicitly wrote into that document guarantees that the American people would remain free of excessive government and restrictive laws. Congress was never intended to become a club house where members could turn every crazy idea they come up with into law without regard for the limits placed on government by the Constitution.

Consider the high price of gas today. Congressional politicians on the left like to point fingers at the oil executives and accuse them of obscene profits but what about the high price of tickets to sporting events or just a movie? What about the obscene profits being made by Hollywood producers and actors as well as athletes who contribute nothing to society beyond entertaining people with nothing better to do than kill time watching others do what they do. Yet they make more money and profit than the oil executives who Congress is badgering over a lousy 4% profit on their production of the life blood of the country. Hollywood invests $100 million in a movie and takes in $800 million. That’s an 800% profit! Where are the calls for excessive profit taxes on Hollywood producers, actors and sports figures whom make millions for simply playing with their balls?

But it’s not just the oil companies that the liberal controlled congress hates. It’s most any corporation or industry that believes in capitalism and profit making. Excessive regulations and taxes on business imposed by government, plus the high cost of labor unions, has driven much of American industry out of the country.

Manufacturing industries must now compete for sales on the global market due to Fair Trade agreements. The problem is that costs imposed by government and labor unions make American made products too expensive to compete in a global market. In order to compete for price, the jobs have to be outsourced to countries like China and India.

The economies of China and India are growing at alarming rates due to the industrialization that we have given them. And because of that industrialization, they require more energy to run their growing manufacturing plants to produce the goods that are then exported to America and being demanded by their own people who now have more money to spend. To power their industries, they require more oil which has now made them strong competitive buyers in the oil market.

This has resulted in demands for oil now exceeding the supply and driving the price up at the gas pump. Essentially, we have given our manufacturing industry to China and India, and we are now paying for it every time we gas up our cars. Liberals in Congress wants to take away what money the oil companies have left and tax them more which will only result in even higher prices at the pump! I find this totally unacceptable. I find this Congress unacceptable, I find this entire growing behemoth of a government unacceptable. But then I’m not a government politician, so it really doesn’t matter. If I were, I would pass legislation against big government and require government to obey the Constitution.

America was never supposed to be about the government. It is supposed to be about the people and their freedom and liberty to build their lives as they see fit without overbearing government supervision and restrictions. By taking away the freedom of industrious and successful Americans to benefit those who prefer a nanny government to take care of them, our government is engaging in the redistribution of liberty along with its socialistic redistribution of wealth.

Our only recourse in putting America back on the right track and restoring our constitutional freedoms and liberties is to remove those politicians from office who do not respect the freedoms and liberties of the American citizens, but instead see themselves as dictators over the American people.

We don’t need more laws to infringe upon our freedom. We need a complete reform of existing laws and proper enforcement of those laws which support the citizens’ right to freedom and liberty according to the Constitution of the United States of America.

I recommend that Congress take a couple of years off from writing new laws, and work instead on the problem of reforming and cleaning out the excessive amounts of existing laws, and restore freedom and liberty to the citizens of this country which they have been stealing away, piece by piece. The redistribution of liberty in America is not what America is about, and never has been, until now.

The Patriot Post