Liberalism Will Lose This
"Cold War"
By: Christopher G. Adamo
On June 24, 1948, after having isolated West Berlin inside of
the boundaries of Communist East Germany, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin suddenly
cut off all road shipments into the city, essentially laying siege to it with
the expectations that it could be starved into subjection and thus added to his
expansionist regime.
In a daring and decisive response President Harry Truman
ordered every available military cargo plane to the area thereby providing a
lifeline of food and supplies to the beleaguered West Berliners. In many
respects, the famous operation that became known as the Berlin Airlift
represented the initial indirect "volley" of the Cold War.
Over the next four decades, the United States and the Soviet
Union, vying for dominance on the world scene, engaged in one pitched battle
after another on innumerable fronts. Yet throughout that entire time, incidents
of direct military confrontation were almost nonexistent, since both sides
feared the possibilities if any such engagement escalated to the point of
involving either nation's massive nuclear arsenals.
Nevertheless, virtually every meeting of the two superpowers,
every cultural competition and every technological contest, represented a
surrogate clash intended to establish dominance by one party over the other,
while at all cost avoiding the direct use of military arms. As time passed the
United States of America emerged time and again as the clear winner, thus
eventuating the collapse of the USSR.
It is important to recognize the various "fronts" on which
that war was conducted from the end of World War II until the Soviet downfall in
1988. From the technological battle signified by the Space Race (decisively won
by the United States on July 20, 1969 as Astronaut Neil Armstrong planted the
American flag on the surface of the moon) to the "line in the sand" of Reagan's
Grenada invasion, each stood as a milestone which could either foretell of
America's ultimate victory, or signal its eventual defeat.
Indeed, the "Cold War" was no less a war than the two
Twentieth Century World Wars that preceded it. And though not as dramatic on the
nightly news for sheer death and mayhem, its battles were no less significant.
Sadly, many in the country believed that with the end of the
Evil Empire, life would somehow become inherently safe. Adages of the "Peace
Dividend" were heard incessantly, with an underlying message being that somehow,
no more threats to America or the Free World existed, nor would any ever arise
again. And for that time of utopian carelessness, America and the Free World are
now paying an enormous price.
Dire threats, from militant Islam to the burgeoning Chinese
empire, to the resurrection of Communist dictatorships in South America, are
rearing their ugly heads. Worst of all, in face of such dangers, American
elitists remain unwilling to recognize them and thus leave the country
comparatively ill prepared to deal with them in the manner that it was during
the heyday of the Soviet threat.
The dark force of liberalism and "political correctness" are
working tirelessly to reorder America in their image. If allowed to continue
unchecked they will cripple America's ability to thrive and prosper, since an
America made over in the image of the left can do neither. And if America fails,
the rest of Western Civilization will follow.
Those who sought to undermine America during the original
Cold War as campus radicals and participants in the leftist fringe underground
are doing it this time around as tenured professors, entrenched politicians, and
"mainstream" media pundits. More than just making noise and calling attention to
themselves, they now influence policy and invoke the power of government to
implement their agendas.
Consider, as one stark example, the present energy situation.
America needs to access the petroleum reserves within its jurisdiction if it is
to have any chance of extricating itself from dependence to hostile foreign
governments, but more than eighty-five percent of America's oil fields have been
locked up by the eco-lobby.
In a telling act of institutionalized indifference, the
recently passed "Energy Bill" does nothing to open America's natural resources
for the strength and security of Americans. Instead, it contains politically
palatable but pointless symbolism, such as the outlawing of incandescent light
bulbs, and the imposition of fuel standards that can only be achieved by
severely degrading driving safety.
The fact that Americans, after a bit of grumbling at the gas
pumps, will simply pay more money and keep driving, is at once a tribute to the
nation's prosperity and a disturbing harbinger of the likelihood that they will
do nothing to properly address the problem before it reaches critical mass.
Federal Judges, through reprehensible abuses of power, find
and expand "constitutional rights" for every vile enemy of the United States,
including combatants who were taken prisoner in armed conflict against this
country. Those who pose a real threat to the safety of Americans, such as the
"flying Imams" who were removed from a commercial flight as they conducted an
apparent dress rehearsal for a hijacking, are granted legal power to inflict
revenge on their victims.
The infamous Kyoto Treaty would have hamstrung U.S. industry
while granting exceptions to increasingly industrialized foreign competitors.
Along with various other UN resolutions intended to accomplish the same ends, it
mirrored the work of the "unilateral disarmament" crowd who would have abolished
America's nuclear deterrence force and thus left us defenseless against a Soviet
nuclear attack.
The Old Testament Book of Nehemiah served as testimony of
God's providential Hand on His people and their resulting strength. It recounts
the wall around Jerusalem that was rebuilt in less than two months, and how
neighboring leaders recognized the strength of those who had built it.
What message is borne to the rest of the world by the fact
that, in six years after the 9/11 attacks, no new towers have been built since
any attempts to do so invariably become mired in "pc" squabbles? Just as
disgraceful is the nation's inability to recognize and support Americans and
American greatness as exemplified by the abysmal "monument" to Flight 93, which
has become a symbol of appeasement and concession.
Even more essential to the future than the physical symbolism
of shining monuments, the towers resurrected, or even the continued prowess of
America' s economic engine, the moral, cultural and spiritual roots of the
nation are in grave need of restoration.