A conservative friend of mine, whom I correspond with, wrote me in sarcastic terms that--regarding Barack Husssein Obama’s recent infamous aspersions on small-town America--"...Obama is correct if you change the wording slightly"; yes, BHO is almost correct...from the point of view of Marxist historical-materialism.

For those not familiar with Marxist “scientific” argot: "Dialectical materialism is the world outlook of the Marxist-Leninist party. It is called dialectical materialism because its approach to the phenomena of nature, its method of studying and apprehending them, is dialectical, while its interpretation of the phenomena of nature, its conception of these phenomena, its theory, is materialistic. Historical materialism is the extension of the principles of dialectical materialism to the study of social life, an application of the principles of dialectical materialism to the phenomena of the life of society, to the study of society and of its history." Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili (aka Stalin)

That said, the two monumentally-revealing issues at the core of BHO's disparagements on small-town people for their "clinging to religion" are that, first, he inadvertently lowered the guard in a meeting that he thought was private and confidential and, second, and more impacting, he premeditatedly let his Marxism spew out of his big mouth, and in full force:

And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Barack Hussein Obama, Marin County, California, Sunday, April 6, 2008

It isn’t a mere coincidence that someone else had postulated--long time ago, in 1844--what in its very essence is what BHO said:

“Religion is the opium of the masses.” Karl Marx

BHO may fool others, but not me, a former Marxist...democratic, though, never a Leninist. He spoke what he truly believes, as, I confess, at one time I did believe in terms of religion and people: People “cling” to religion, which translates to Marxist lingo that people opiate themselves with religion.

Trying to undo the undoable, BHO came out braying that all what happened was that he “misspoke”. And he’s right; but with the caption that the only “misspeaking” in his venomous attack on whom Marxists call “lumpen”--ordinary people stuck to their traditional values and beliefs, that is--was in the sense that he spoke to the wrong crowd in ultra-leftist Marin County: There was a Clinton “mole” in the midst. (LOL!)

For there shouldn’t be any doubt that it was a Clinton spook who taped BHO’s Marxist revilements on small-town regular Americans, revilements which Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton, another Marxist in her own right, refers to as “elitist”.

Ingenious moves by HDRC: She plants spies at the very core of BHO’s support crème de la crème, and then she immediately gives BHO a lethal one-two with the intelligence gathered. Brilliant! (LOL, again!)

By tagging BHO’s derogatory imputations on small-town America as “elitist”, HDRC kills two birds with one stone: She uses the term “elitist” as a double-edged sword on BHO. First, she employs “elitist” in plain English when addressing the people, for the English language acceptation of the term connects as utterly offensive to anyone with more than a milligram of gray matter and a millimeter of spine. Second, she uses “elitist” when addressing BHO in their shared sectarian language: Marxist parlance. In Marxist phraseology, “elitist” can be taken as a perfect synonym of “bourgeois”, a venomous and fulminating insult traded by Marxists when quarreling to the max, when going to the jugular...and BHO’s jugular is what HDRC went to.

It could be very plausibly then to, first, assert that HDRC inflicted a double checkmate on BHO and, consequently, forecast that BHO’s presidential aspirations may be now but finished: He either doesn't get the Democrat nomination, or loses in November.

BHO’s self-inflicted damage is monumental, and seemingly irreparable. But, just in case, we conservatives must make sure that it keeps that way...but not that much, so that the two Marxist creeps keep bludgeoning and bleeding each other all the way to Denver. Let’s turn the tables on them, for a change; let’s play cute Cesare Borgia for a little while, which is what they, from their Marxist-inherent amorality, normally do.

As for the absorption of BHO’s derision of rural and small-town America by the public in general, another friend, a former democratic-Marxist like me, warned me that most Americans won't grasp--in its full depth--the meaning of what BHO spoke.

“Tell a dude in the street that BHO’s vituperations on what it constitutes a large sector of the American fabric, a sector of great lineage in American history, were an authentic reflection of Marx’s thought, and the dude would be totally confused...as if you were talking Martian.", my ex-Marxist friend suggested.

He’s perfectly right. The Democrats and the rest of the Left, along with the complicity of their useful-idiots (aka, liberals), have wrecked our K-12 public education system. And they have done such a good job that, if you tell the neighbor next door that BHO’s contumelies are a pure reflection of Marx’s thought, the elicited answer would be a catatonic “What does Graucho, Zeppo, Chico or Harpo have to do with it?”

My ex-Marxist friend proposed that, therefore, we conservatives in general should stick to pounding BHO only on the "bitterness", "small-town people", "elitism" and other secondary notions and contentions floating around BHO's obloquies, for that is what would touch a nerve in ordinary folks.

He, however, emphasized that we--the ones who were in the guts of the beast at one time, and that, therefore, realize the kernel of the issue in its entirety--should keep, in parallel, iterating endlessly, but subtly, on the Marxist tenor of BHOs invectives on the people whom he, BHO, claims to be the Messiah of. The idea being to keep exposing continually BHO’s true nature to those who can see beyond what the John and Jane Does of America can see.

Sadly, most likely in today’s America, only learned Marxists, former or present, or academics who studied Marxism, would catch it on the fly and understand that what BHO spoke in Marin County was Marxist "truth". And, furthermore, most likely only a Marxist contriver, past or present, would realize that BHO blundered big time, as there is no doubt that he, BHO, strives jealously to try to keep his Marxism true ego under thick and crafty disguise.

For a Marxist, religion “...is but just a way of keeping the masses opiated into accepting any crap that the counterfeit owners of the means of production and distribution of goods and services impose on them here on Earth; for religion, or faith, mislead them into believing the other crap, that true happiness is to be found only in Heaven.” (Clodomiro Almeyda, prominent 20th century Chilean Marxist-Leninist theoretician and politician)

That's what Barack Hussein Obama--very premeditatedly, no doubt whatsoever--meant when berating small-town America for “clinging to religion,” that is, for smoking and inhaling "the opium of the masses." In other words, BHO manifested clearly and explicitly his Marxist historical-materialistic perceptional grasp of small-town America...as a token of his view of Americans, and of human society at large.

Is he the man we should hire as the next President of the United States of America?