In an August 2006 column I wrote about current efforts by the
Vatican to obtain reciprocity for religious practice by Christians and Jews in
Islamic states.
Unfortunately, the Islamic approach to religious tolerance is
totally incompatible with western political traditions, and always will be.
Hence, there is nothing that the Vatican can do through a more confrontational
approach that will in any way slow the Islamic invasion of Christendom, or
convince Muslims that they must allow Christians and Jews the freedom to openly
practice their religious beliefs in Islamic states.
That battle was lost before it began, although a few liberal
daydreamers and left wing nutcases cling to the fantasy that moderate and
liberal Muslims will one day rise up and confront radical Islam. For those who
are betting their lives (and mine) on that forlorn hope I would remind them of
seven simple words: “Those who cure you will kill you.”
That cryptic warning was related to an Anglican priest, Andrew
White, during an inter-faith conference in Jordan a short time before an
eight-member Islamic terror cell, which included seven medical doctors, staged
an attack on public facilities in London and Glasgow… an attack that was
intended to murder and maim large numbers of innocent men, women, and children.
So, what are the chances that Muslims can, or ever will,
assimilate into western society? Is it possible that we can ever live in
peace and harmony with people who are taught that it is their duty to kill
Christians and Jews and to kill any and all who criticize their religion? If the
Vatican expects to find “reciprocity” with such people they are engaging in some
very foolish wishful thinking.
There are those who insist that radical Islam represents only a
small minority of Muslims… perhaps only one in ten… but ten percent of 1.4
billion amounts to 140 million.
In all of America’s previous wars, from the Revolutionary War
to Vietnam and Desert Storm, we have not faced 20 million enemy combatants. Now
we face more than seven times that number. Yet, they are not separated from us
by battle lines or national frontiers. They are here, living and traveling
freely among us. And, unlike previous enemies, they do not fear death, they wear
no uniforms, they recognize no rules of war, and they willingly slaughter women
and children.
Former Speaker Newt Gingrich has suggested the convening of
another Geneva Convention to deal with the threat of Islam. Such an
international conference would provide an opportunity for western nations to
redefine Islam for what it is, not for what Islam claims to be. It must be
redefined, not as a religion deserving of legal protection under western law,
and not as a military force deserving of protection under the Geneva Convention,
but as a radical and dangerous religious sect that has declared holy war against
all of civilized society.
The oath of allegiance required of all newly naturalized
American citizens says, in part, “I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely
and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign
prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or (of) which I have heretofore
been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and
laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on
behalf of the United States when required by the law… and that I take this
obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help
me God.”
The convening of a second Geneva Convention would provide an
opportunity for all native-born and hyphenated Americans, including
Muslim-Americans, to reaffirm that oath, and any individual who would feel
uncomfortable making that solemn commitment should be informed of his/her
alternatives.
Ultimately, it must be a matter of public policy in the West
that Muslims will have the same right to practice their religion in western
countries as Christians, Jews, and others enjoy in Islamic states. Nothing less
will suffice. And if Muslims are unable to accept such reciprocity then we must
be prepared to withdraw from them the First Amendment rights that they now
demand.
We must make it clear to all who come here that we are a nation
founded on Judeo-Christian values… not Muslim values, not Hindu values. To us, a
cow is just beefsteak on the hoof and anyone who cannot enjoy a good ham
sandwich or the sight of a beautiful female body will probably be much happier
someplace else. That’s who we are and we’re not about to change any of that to
accommodate some fool with one foot stuck in the twenty-first century and the
other planted firmly in the seventh.
In the meantime, it will be interesting to see how many British
and American liberals will be canceling appointments with their Muslim
physicians.