Posted: 03/30/08
The Insolent Arrogance of
the Progressive-Left
By Frank Salvato
A recent event in Chicago illustrates the
arrogance and narcissism of the Progressive-Left – and in particular the
anti-war Progressive-Left. During Easter services at Holy Name Cathedral
Catholic Church in Chicago, six anti-war protesters staged a political
demonstration disrupting religious services. They shouted generic anti-war
slogans and squirted fake blood on themselves and the parishioners in
attendance. Their goal was to attract attention to themselves and – therefore –
their cause. It worked.
The group of three men and three women, who
call themselves Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War (interesting self-commentary
on the three “men” involved), issued a statement saying they purposely targeted
Holy Name Cathedral – specifically on Easter – to reach a large audience,
including the press, which usually covers the services.
A representative of the International Solidarity Movement told the Chicago Tribune
that he attended the protest to serve as a witness for the Catholic Schoolgirls
Against the War.
Chicago Police removed the protesters and
charged them with one count of felony criminal damage to property and two counts
each of misdemeanor simple battery.
Where to begin...
First, we should examine the base element of
the Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War and their supporters.
Catholic School Girls Against the
War
The website for the Illinois Coalition for Peace and Justice (which
evidently hosts the group’s Internet presence) describes the group as:
“...a humorous, political street threatre
group composed of college students and young adults.”
It is obvious to even the most intellectually
challenged that the designation “street theatre group” is an attempt to
inoculate their actions; an attempt to re-define any of their civil disobedience
– criminal acts – as “theatre.”
As far as the “humorous” description goes, I
suppose humor is in the eye of the beholder, although I don’t believe that any
of the young children in attendance at Holy Name Cathedral, children who were
frightened by the actions of this group – in their place of worship, a place
that is meant to provide sanctuary, found the splattering of fake blood and
shrieks of agenda-driven insolence “humorous.”
Illinois Coalition for Peace &
Justice
In their Structure & Statement of Values, the Illinois Coalition for
Peace & Justice, which is linked to the Progressive Democrats of America website, claims their organization:
“...models a just and peaceful
society...[resolving] to use our work in the Illinois Coalition for Peace and
Justice as a model of equal and supportive relationships in a peaceful and just
society...”
The ICPJ is by definition an anti-war protest
organization. Where they claim to act as a coordinating organization, they
facilitate the activities of a number of activist groups, including the American Muslim Council, the Campus Anti-War Network and Code Pink, to name just three.
Interestingly, their Structure & Statement
of Values declaration says they:
“...work in common for: alternatives to
militarism, global community, lives of active nonviolence, human rights for all,
preservation of the environment...”
By disrupting a religious service and, in the
process, creating fear among children and angst among adults, it is hard to see
how the ICPJ – through its member organization, the Catholic Schoolgirls Against
the War – promoted any of these tenets and/or values, especially “global
community,” “nonviolence” or “human rights.”
International Solidarity Movement
The
organization that sent a representative to act as a “witness” for the
protesters, the International Solidarity Movement, is an anti-war organization
but only where the United States and the West are concerned. In fact, it can be
argued that they are vehemently anti-Western and anti-American.
The International Solidarity Movement is,
according to Discover the Networks,
“...a radical, anti-Israel organization that
recruits Westerners to travel to Israel to obstruct Israeli security
operations...[they justify] Palestinian terrorism against Israeli
civilians...”
Though the organization claims to adhere to a
commitment to non-violence, its members openly call for the "liberation of
Palestinians by any means necessary...[including] legitimate armed
struggle."
One of the groups officials, Hisham Jam Joun, a
veteran of the Marxist-Leninist terror group Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, led
pro-Palestinian protests against the Israeli security barrier.
In 2003, two British nationals executed a
suicide bombing in an Israeli bar that killed three people and wounded more than
50. In the course of their investigation into the bombing Israeli officials
discovered that the bombers had met with International Solidarity Movement
leaders just prior to carrying out the attack. This prompted the Israeli
government to formally accuse the organization of maintaining ties to
Palestinian terror entities. Said one IDF officer:
“...as far as we are concerned, ISM is not
an international organization or a peace organization. It's a pro-Palestinian
organization, set up by Palestinians, funded by Palestinians and linked to
Palestinian terror."
In addition, the group continues to advocate
for the release of Marwan Barghouti, a leader in the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades.
Barghouti was convicted of committing acts of terrorism and with the murders of
26 people through the facilitation of several suicide bombing events that took
place in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.
To put it mildly, there is nothing peaceful
about the International Solidarity Movement or their actions. The causes for
which they advocate are about as far away from “humorous, political street
theatre” as one can get.
The Question of Constitutional
Rights
The violent, intolerant, hypocritical and narcissistic nature of
these groups exposed, the facet of this story that is truly shocking is this:
These intellectually stunted malcontents attempted to deny the people attending
Catholic Mass at Holy Name Cathedral their constitutionally guaranteed right to practice their religion, yet
charges to this affect are not being explored. Instead they are being charged
with felony criminal damage to property and misdemeanor simple battery.
The First Amendment to the United States
Constitution specifically states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
This guarantee of non-intervention by
government with regard to religion, speech and assembly has been interpreted
over the years to provide for the sanctity of religious practice, the protection
of free speech and the inviolability of peaceable assembly.
By interrupting a religious service on its most
holy of days (the resurrection of Christ, signified by the celebration of
Easter, is the most glorified event in the Catholic faith, not Christmas, which
signifies the birth of Christ) the Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War denied
the parishioners their constitutional right to freely practice religion, they
denied Cardinal Francis George his constitutional right to freedom of speech and
religious practice and both their right to peaceably assemble.
That federal authorities are not exploring the
possibility of charging, not only the six malcontents from Catholic Schoolgirls
Against the War but the leaders of both the Illinois Coalition for Peace &
Justice and the International Solidarity Movement, with violating the
constitutional rights of the Cardinal and the parishioners of Holy Name
Cathedral is a testimony to how little value we place on our constitutional
rights, how delinquent we are in understanding the ideology behind our
constitutional rights and our apathy in defending them when they are
attacked.
Ingenuous protest is one thing and it is
perfectly acceptable, but anarchist indignance goes beyond anything that can be
deemed acceptable. Charge them, prosecute them and make an example out of
them.