Young voters swoon at his feet like prepubescent girls at a Beatles concert.
Black religious charlatans like Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan are pimping for
him from the pulpit. Old guards of the American Socialist movement like Teddy
Kennedy, have latched on to his Elvis-like charisma and even mass media moguls
like Oprah Winfrey and the liberal lame stream press have strapped on a harness
to pull the Obama campaign wagon to historic Black Power victory.
But who is Barack Hussein Obama? What is his real record? What does he really
believe in? What are his past accomplishments and his qualifications for the
most powerful elected office in the world? What does he mean by this enigmatic
thing called "change?"
His supporters can tell you all about his "charisma," his promise of "hope,"
the need for "change" and their heartfelt belief that if Obama becomes
president, the world will be all we had dreamed it could be. They will gleefully
regurgitate all of his campaign talking points as if they know him personally
and thought them all up on their own.
But what they can’t tell you is who the man is, what he has ever done in the
past, what makes him qualified to be scout troop master, what kind of change he
has in mind or why they believe he is capable of changing anything…
When asked why they support Obama, the answers range from "I have waited
all my life to cast a vote for the first black president," to "His
complete lack of leadership experience makes him the perfect agent of
change." Of course, he’s not black and we seldom hire the most
inexperienced individual for the most critical position, even with affirmative
action in play. But hey, we’re making history here! Don’t let the facts get in
your way.
FactCheck and OnTheIssues are working overtime to keep up with
all the Obama campaign rhetoric. But apparently, Obama supporters never bother
to check the facts when it comes to their candidate of hope and change.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the fact is; beyond charismatic,
Barack Hussein Obama is almost none of the things he claims to be.
Time for the real Barack Obama record…
According to Obama, he rejects campaign funding from
"lobbyists," "Political Action Committees" and "bundlers" who bundle individual
contributions into blind block contributions.
But according to FactCheck, he does accept "bundled" contributions from
"lobbyist groups" as well as individual campaign contributions from the spouses
of well-known Washington lobbyists. He also receives tons of "bundled" funds
from labor unions and Democrat 527 organizations.
When pressed on the issue, (on rare occasion), he admits "Money is the
original sin in politics and I am not sinless" and states "Lobbyist influence
comes from access, not money." In short, Obama is funded by the same lobbyists
and special interest groups as all other Democrats. He’s just slicker about
covering the money trail.
According to Obama and CAF, who gives him a 100% rating, indicating a strong
position for energy independence, Obama will solve the problem
of dependence on foreign oil and skyrocketing gas prices.
But according to OnTheIssues, Obama voted to defund U.S. domestic oil
exploration, voted to ban U.S. drilling in ANWR and block all efforts to
increase U.S. refining capacity, voted to force Americans to reduce their oil
consumption by 40% by 2025 instead of the 5% supported by the balance of
congress, voted to force Detroit to build more hybrids, voted to burn more
ethanol (food) and factor the Global Warming Scam into all national energy
policies. Obama takes the most liberal position in congress on energy and keeps
the U.S. dependent upon foreign oil as a result.
According to his campaign website, Obama is a "Child
Advocate" - "Barack Obama is a committed advocate for children, - and
he will protect children from violence and neglect."
However, Obama has been an ardent opponent of every child’s fundamental right
to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. The National Right to Life
Association gives him a perfect zero rating, indicating an unwavering support
for a woman’s right to kill. He voted against every child’s right to life at
every opportunity, including voting against the ban on the heinous act of
Partial Birth Abortion. He has staked out the most extreme left position
available against children. He believes strongly in a woman’s right to kill her
young, but not in a woman’s right to spend household income on food rather than
health insurance.
Obama claims to oppose all forms of racism, including
"racial profiling" (aka criminal and terror profiling).
But he has a strong record of supporting Affirmative Action,
which provides special advantage to specific citizens over all other citizens,
strictly on the basis of race. He also supports treating drug
dealing as a "minimum wage problem" and not a criminal activity, based
on drug trafficking being prevalent in black communities.
Obama claims strength in Foreign Policy, National Security
and the advancement of Democracy around the globe.
But he opens his campaign rhetoric with this statement, "When I am this
party's nominee, my opponent will not be able to say that I voted for the war in
Iraq," a post 9/11 foreign policy initiative supported overwhelmingly by
both parties in both houses of congress as a vital matter of both national
security and the advancement of democracy in parts of the world important to
America’s strategic interests.
Further, he "didn’t vote for war in Iraq" because he was not a
member of congress when that vote took place, nor did he have access to the
intelligence reports over twelve years beginning in 1991, that caused the vast
majority of congress and his DNC opponent Hillary Clinton, to support deposing
the Hussein regime and liberate, not invade, the Iraqi people.
Today Obama is lashing back at attacks from John McCain regarding Iraq, by
stating for his blindly ill-informed followers that "Al Qaeda was not in
Iraq until after George Bush invaded Iraq." This is of course an untrue
statement. Al Qaeda indeed had cells operating in Iraq long
before congress authorized the deposing of Hussein in 2003. In fact, Al Qaeda
had cells inside Iraq before 9/11/01 and Hussein government officials had
traveled from Iraq to Afghanistan for the sole purpose of seeking common
anti-western interests with Al Qaeda as far back as 1996, all of which has been
reported widely and recorded even in the 9/11 Commission Report that Obama often
quotes on other matters.
Obama’s first promise of change comes in the form of a call for
retreat and defeat in Iraq, which every international expert can tell
you will destabilize Iraq’s current progress towards secure democratic reform,
an idea Obama claims to hold dear, but won’t support.
He wants to bring our troops home immediately, but in defeat, not victory.
He wants to launch a new era of dialogue and cooperation with the worlds most
brutal and committed enemies of the west in North Korea, Iran,
and China, with folks like Chavez and Castro. He says that
"China is our competitor, not our enemy," even as Chinese spies are being
brought to justice for infiltrating the most secret of U.S. national security
agencies.
But he wants a U.S. Military enforced "no fly zone" in Africa, where the
ancestors of his radical Muslim father live in tyranny,
oppressed by African war lords and corrupt African politicians, not American
slave traders.
He talks about a more secure and sovereign America as he pushes to erase U.S.
borders, legalize illegal migration - including with full voting rights for
illegals, and calls for "increased tax-payer investment in our relationship with
Mexico" while asking for "$50B annually to strengthen weak states at risk of
collapse," not American states, third world dictatorships.
Obama is not only completely unqualified to be Commander-in-Chief, he
would be the most dangerous choice available in 2008.
Do I need to keep going with the real Obama record of leadership and change?
This candidate is nothing but charismatic, with an uncanny ability to sell
garbage to unsuspecting young voters who have yet to make their first car
payment, much less figure out what’s best for America.
If you are unable to recognize the pattern of faulty logic and flat out lies
that make up the Obama campaign, listing more examples won’t help you. But maybe
what kind of change he has in mind will get your attention…
Obama’s Future for America
Like his political heroes, and great agents of change Saul
Alinsky and Karl
Marx, Obama is a charismatic rebel rouser with an abstract but
eloquent Farrakhan styled cadence in his public delivery. But like his heroes,
his goods must be sold as something other than what they really are, because
even the most ill-formed American voter will not knowing support Democratic
Socialism under its official name.
So instead of calling it socialized medicine, we call it
universal health care. It’s the same thing, but one sounds
better than the other, even to college kids.
Some of Obama’s words can be taken to heart though… just not his campaign
words.
Candidate Obama says he opposes gay marriage and supports
same-sex unions. – But Senator Obama said – "I opposed the Defense
of Marriage Act in 1996. It should be repealed and I will vote for its repeal on
the Senate floor. I will also oppose any proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution
to ban gays and lesbians from marrying."
"My parents shared not only an improbable love; they shared an
abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation. They would give me an African
name, Barack, or blessed, believing that in a tolerant America your name is no
barrier to success." – Here, he’s actually defending his given
middle name, Hussein, not his first name "blessed."
"Today we are engaged in a deadly global struggle for those who
would intimidate, torture, and murder people for exercising the most basic
freedoms. If we are to win this struggle and spread those freedoms, we must keep
our own moral compass pointed in a true direction." – Yet he
supports the most immoral social policies on earth, abortion, sexual perversion,
socialism and affirmative action against all people not of color, and opposes
the struggle for freedom and democracy in Iraq.
About the struggle for democracy in Iraq, Obama says – "We're not
going to baby sit a civil war."
Wife Michelle Obama is right when she say’s – "Barack will not
allow Americans to go back to life as usual." Based on Obama’s
positions on countless issues, I’d say life in America will never be the same
again…
If Obama followers can stop fainting at his Elvis-like pep rallies long
enough to actually research the man, his lack of accomplishment and experience,
his insanely naïve policy platform and his Marxist ideas of change for America,
Barack won’t continue to run away with the Democrat nomination, even against a
weak opponent like Hillary Clinton.
For all of Hillary’s obvious faults, she’s not Barack Obama and my hope is
that Obama fans take a deep breath and research their candidate before they make
an error in judgment that every American will live to regret. Marx and Alinsky
had hope for change too… Is this the change Obama supporters really
have in mind?
For heaven sake - Even
Rosanne Barr gets this one
right!
"When I fly in an airplane I want the pilot with the most experience, not
the one who can inspire hope in me that I get to where I am going. When I pay my
taxes, I want the person filing them to be experienced, not the new person who
inspires hope in me that he can do the job. When I hire someone to fix my
washing machine, I want the tried and true experienced person, not the one who
inspires me to hope that he can fix it. When I go to the doctor I do not want to
get the one who inspires hope in me that s/he can cure what's wrong, but the one
who knows what the hell to do the minute I call. It's not really the job of a
public servant to inspire, but to get the job that the people demand done. The
democrats think that if they have hope and are inspired things will get better,
but they actually won't. When Oprah makes her employees sign her fifty page
non-disclosure statement, she doesn't "hope" they can't break it, she pays teams
of experienced lawyers to MAKE SURE they can't break it, or be sued in an
experienced court by an experienced judge."