What’s all that fuss about the Democrat "super-delegates"? Isn’t, anyway, the Democrat Party of nowadays, for all practical purposes, but just a flagrant and blatant front of the Left?

Purportedly the 1982 brainchild---a stillbirth actually---of Democrat strategist (stratagemist?) and FOX News contributor Robert "Bob" Beckel, the super-delegates are nothing else than a flagrant, watered-down version of the abominable contraption common among the "progressive" regimes in communist countries. Beckel created the cave-age abomination purportedly to help Walter Mondale---whose campaign he managed---secure two years late the Democrat Nomination.

In communist countries---the epitome of leftism and "progressivism"---they refer to the repugnant contraption with the oxymoronic name of "Democratic Centralism", meaning that democracy becomes "centralized" in the rubber-stamping party politburo, that is, in the body of party servile lackeys whose only purpose in life is fawning on the "progressive" tyrant at the cusp. The bizarre and repugnant "rationale" being that the politburo will sacrifice its members by making them sparing the people the arduous work of unraveling the intricacies---and the most taxing burden of dealing with the nuances---of democracy.

Beckel "brainstormed" his American version of the abhorrence "to help to pick a winner if there was no clear front-runner and to discourage anti-establishment candidates." The idea was that the Democrat Party nomenklatura---the army of professional party political bosses and insiders---would be the nursery of super-delegates, who, like the members of the politburos of "progressive" (i.e., communist) countries, would arrogate the right of the people to decide by themselves.

The Democrat super-delegates arrogate the right of common Democrats to decide who the nominee of the "progressive" Democrat Party will be.

And the most tragically-hilarious thing is that the two Democrats running for the nomination are both arch-anti-establishment. The only difference between the two is that Hillary is a true-believer Marxist from the hippie generation, while Obama is a true-believer Marxist from around the times of the birth of Generation X. It’s just a generational difference between those two anti-establishment candidates, who have made a masterful use precisely of the establishment itself to scale to positions of power from which their could launch their onslaught on America more effectively.

We should expose the shameful sham of the Democrat Party’s super-delegates for what the abhorrent practice really is: an abject copy of the odious practice in communist parties of "Democratic Centralism" that shouldn't play any role in America, "the land of the free, and the home of the brave."