The 2008 primary election process has clearly been unfair to
conservative candidates, and here's why. Several liberal and
moderate/independent states chose to hold their primary elections and caucuses
early, all wanting to be first - so they said. But look at what has happened as
a result. Conservative candidates like Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter have been
drummed out of the race by breaking their bank accounts in non conservative
states before the rest of the country ever had a chance to vote for them. Is
this what we call "fair and democratic elections?”
These are supposed to be national elections, not independent
state elections. By allowing some states to hold primaries before others gives
those states the advantage to propel or retard the individual campaigns
depending on the political landscape of those few states. As we are now seeing,
when liberal and moderate states hold early elections, conservative candidates
have no chance of ever making it into the general election or winning the
If we are ever again to have fair elections in this country,
then primary elections are going to have to be standardized and held on the same
day in all states, if everyone is to have a chance to participate in the
election process. Either that or there is going to have to be a media blackout
until everyone has had a chance to vote. Election returns are not allowed to air
until the polls are closed. Does it make any sense that we should be seeing
election returns from other states before we even have a chance to go to the
polls? I don’t want a few small states deciding who we can vote for in the party
We hear so much about voter disenfranchisement these days but
nobody is talking about the disenfranchisement of conservatives to vote for
candidates who share their views. If your favorite candidate is purged from the
race early, then where is your right to vote for the candidate of your choice?
"Write ins?" In most voting methods today there is no provision to write in a
candidate's name, and even if there were, what chance would he have of winning?
Most voters are going to vote for a name printed on the ballot. This year we
have seen the largest disenfranchisement of voters in history, and they are all
Did this occur by chance, or was it planned from the start?
Considering the ambitions of George Soros and Billary Clinton to gain and hold
power over the country by any means necessary, by hook or by crook, I can’t
dismiss the possibility that this was no accident. Yet the Republican leadership
will never challenge the legitimacy of elections or the likelihood of voter
fraud on the part of the Democrats. It’s almost as though they are willing
parties to election corruption.
Now the media wants us to think that John McCain is the
frontrunner for the Republicans in spite of fact that he is the most liberal
Republican in the race. McCain will never be elected president, the conservative
base simply will not vote for him. Most of them would rather vote for Ron Paul
who may be a conservative alternative on a 3rd party ticket in
November, or they will simply not vote at all, just as they did in 2006. Why go
to the polls to vote if no one you like is running?
The purpose of voting is having your voice heard and counted
for the candidate of your choice; not about electing a political party that no
longer represents your views. We are tired of voting for the lesser of two evils
in America. What’s the point when it’s simply six of one, and a half dozen of
the other, both choices bad? Voters who feel disenfranchised will simply throw
up their hands and say “why bother?” McCain would be preferable to the Clintons
or Obama only on the issue of national security. On most other issues, there is
virtually little difference.
Liberal economic policies have dominated Washington ever since
George W. Bush was elected. The government continues to pump worthless money
into the economy just like they did this week with the cut in interest rates,
which only makes the problem worse. The economy should be controlled by the free
market, not the government. This is just another example of the Communism that
has been taking over America.
Every time the government does something to influence the
economy, it just gets worse. That is the same thing that destroyed the Soviet
Union. Eventually it just went bankrupt trying to control the Russian economy
and "take care of it's people," just like the Democrats are campaigning on right
now. Problems only get worse when government gets involved. The government is
the problem, not the solution.
The economy has to be allowed to flow freely and seek it’s own
level, influenced only by the marketplace. Anytime the government interferes
with that using what they call “stimulus,” it causes more inflation and our
money declines in value, resulting in only an artificial and temporary fix. The
real fix is to let the economy seek it’s own market level, not pump it up with
artificial stimulus just to make the numbers look good on paper.
Yet, the American voters are still too ignorant to see it and
continue voting for these liberals in both parties who are driving the country
straight into Communism. The Democrat plan of dumbing down America over the past
couple of generations has been successful. It's too late now to re-educate the
people, because it has become too widespread. I'm afraid we have already lost
the country. We have tried to warn them for decades but they wouldn't listen.
They insist on asking what their country can do for them, rather than what they
can do for their country.
With our money becoming worth less and less, and our products
dependent mostly on foreign trade, even Washington spending more money to keep
'the people' alive won't help; it will all just be worthless. Bush and the
Congress should have seen this coming years ago but ignored it. They all
invested in their own survival by giving our money to special interests and pork
vendors who they expect will pay them back personally after the crash of our
With Fred Thompson now out of the race, I'm almost ready to
switch my support to Ron Paul and throw them a real turkey. His foreign policy
is a disaster but he's a strict constitutionalist and will veto every bill the
Congress tries to pass that includes unconstitutional spending, which is just
about all of them.
Of course, Paul won't win the elections - no way, no how. He
will likely run as a 3rd party candidate, splitting the Republican party in two
because the Republican party no longer seems to represent real conservatives. I
don't think Paul is the right man for the job but I would like to see some of
his policies regarding constitutional government established in Washington.
I'm starting to think now that this may be the time for a mass
exodus from the Republican party and the right time to form a 3rd party of
conservatives, but without the antiwar, anti-defense, blame America first
attitude of the Paul Libertarians.
It doesn't look like it's going to get any better in the
Republican party, they had their chance. Every real conservative who speaks out
seems to get thrown under the bus just like moderates do in the Democrat party.
Remember George Allen, Rick Santorum, and Tom Delay? Many of us hoped that
Republicans would have learned their lesson from the 2006 elections. That being
that “you can’t beat the Democrats by trying to be like them.” Instead, the
Republicans have become the Socialist party, while the Democrats have become the
Communist party. I've had enough of it.
There is a chance that Romney can hold Republicans together but
not McCain or Huckabee. Nor can Guliani, but he will probably be next to drop
out if Huckabee doesn‘t beat him to it. Romney is going to have problems with
some Evangelicals who won't support him on religious grounds, and conservatives
will not support or vote for McCain. There is little chance we can win in
November. The Republican party has destroyed itself by trying to be like
There is the possibility that the Republican party has been
corrupted by Democrats crossing over to vote for Republicans in the primary in
order to accomplish just what we see happening. It could all be part of a plot
hatched by George Soros and the Clintons to do just that. It’s something to
consider. Otherwise, I just can't make any sense out of the way the Republicans
are voting today. Where have all of the conservatives gone? To their graves? Or
were they all waiting to vote for a conservative in the states that now will not
have that opportunity?
A mass exodus from the Republican party, now on the heels of
Thompson's departure, would send a clear message to the party leadership that
they have gone astray and are on the verge of collapse if they don't come back
to the conservative base. In the meantime, even registered as independent voters
without party affiliation, we can still vote against the democrats and for the
Republican candidate, or anyone else we choose.
Conservatives are loyal to their values and beliefs, not to a
political party. The Republican party no longer shares those values and beliefs
and no longer deserves the support of conservatives. I will reregister as an
independent voter until I see a third party emerge that represents my beliefs.
In the meantime, I consider myself just another disenfranchised conservative