While politicians on the left are telling us that global warming is
threatening to destroy our planet and we need to take affirmative action to stop
it by making major changes to industry standards and our life style, scientific
institutions are telling us that the warming cycle is over and the planet is
beginning to cool. Not just gradual cooling but rapid cooling that just over the
past year, has cancelled out the warming cycle of the past 100 years.
In an article on DailyTech.com, Michael Asher tells us:
Over the past year, anecdotal evidence for a cooling planet has exploded.
China has its coldest winter in 100 years. Baghdad sees its first snow in all
recorded history. North America has the most snowcover in 50 years, with places
like Wisconsin the highest since record-keeping began. Record levels of
Antarctic sea ice, record cold in Minnesota, Texas, Florida, Mexico, Australia,
Iran, Greece, South Africa, Greenland, Argentina, Chile -- the list goes on and
No more than anecdotal evidence, to be sure. But now, that evidence has been
supplanted by hard scientific fact. All four major global temperature tracking
outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show
that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped
Other studies are now reporting that the polar icecaps have returned to their
earlier size, before the late century melting, and even thicker than before. In
another article, Asher tells us that although there has been a
sharp warming trend since the year 1900, these warming trends are not unusual as
evidenced by a study of Arctic tree rings over more than a thousand years. These
same warming periods also occurred in AD 750, 1000, 1400, and 1750, all equally
warm or warmer than at present. In other words, about every 250 to 350 years.
Global warming proponents like to use the year 1900 as a standard for global
temperature, but the truth is that in 1900, the Earth was actually cooler than
the norm, so the temperature increases over the past century were nothing more
than the planet recovering from a cold period. Asher also notes that current
Arctic temperatures have actually declined 0.3 degrees over the past 1000 years.
Another thing the politicians donít like to tell you is that current
temperatures are now actually slightly cooler than they were a decade ago. We
have been seeing a slight decline in the overall average global temperature
since 1998. The following recent 20 year
graph demonstrates this, and also shows the dramatic temperature
decline over the past year.
But how can this be happening when the latest government climate control
restrictions havenít even gone into effect? What about all those hydrocarbons
and carbon dioxide that we are continuing to pump into the environment? Why
arenít they continuing to warm the planet as we are being led to believe by the
The answer, of course, is that they are not responsible for the
temperatures of our planet and consequently, not is human life on the
planet. A 33% increase in carbon dioxide simply means that instead of three
CO2 molecules in 10,000 molecules of air, there are now four. Some
have equated this to having the same effect as a ďfart in a hurricane.Ē
Carbon dioxide is as necessary to life on Earth as is oxygen, itís what
plants breath and grow on. By using photosynthesis, plants extract the carbon
atom to use for their growth, then expel the two oxygen atoms from
each CO2 molecule. The logical reason for the increase of
CO2 in the atmosphere is an excessive human population breathing the
air, and deforestation reducing the plant population.
These two essential components of life must remain in balance for life to
continue on the planet. Animal, plant, air, and water are all connected together
in a cycle to produce and maintain a living planet and a change in one effects
the others. Drastic changes in the balance caused by such things as an asteroid
collision or major volcanic activity, can have an effect on global temperatures
but they are not the primary cause of regular temperature change
cycles. The sun is.
Scientists are now expressing concerns that we may be on the precipice of
another ice age, or at least a cooling trend like those seen during the middle
ages. The reason for this is a current lack of sunspot activity. Sunspots come
and go in cycles of about 12 years but scientists fear that the currently-due
cycle of increased sunspots may not start up on schedule.
High sunspot activity results in higher temperatures on Earth. Low sunspot
activity results in lower temperatures on earth. Sunspots are the result of
magnetic fields breaking though the surface of the sun.
In yet another
article on Daily Tech, this
link is discussed. The article claims that researchers at DMI have discovered
ďwhat they believe to be the link between solar activity and the Earth's
temperature. The key factor isn't changes in solar output, but rather changes in
the sun's magnetosphere A stronger field shields the earth more from cosmic
rays, which act as "seeds" for cloud formation. The result is less cloud cover,
and a warming planet. When the field weakens, clouds increase, reflecting more
light back to space, and the earth cools off.Ē
But there is another little known factor that contributes to the Earthís
Research by Geophysicist, J. Marvin
Herndon, has shown that the
center of the Earth is not an iron core as previously thought, but rather a
uranium nuclear reactor. This makes perfect sense since we know that uranium is
among the heaviest natural elements that exist on earth, and that it would
naturally have sunk to the center of the planet when the Earth was formed.
Further evidence of nuclear reactors at the center of planets exists in the fact
that Jupiter radiates twice as much energy into space than it receives from
In Dr. Herndonís experiments, he has also found that the radiation from these
nuclear reactors is not a constant, but rather a variable. At times they radiate
more heat than at other times. That heat is transmitted eventually to the
surface of the planet where it effects global temperatures.
If the sun is at a sunspot low cycle, and the nuclear furnace at the center
of the Earth is also at a low in its energy production, itís going to get very
cold on Earth. On the other hand, if both the sun and the Earthís nuclear
furnace are at a high energy level, itís going to get quite warm at the surface
of the planet. These are the real factors that regulate and control the planetís
global mean temperatures, not human activity.
So what can we do to ward off another ice age? If we believe what the global
warmites and the politicians are telling us, then it seems that we already have
the answer. If we can prevent warming by reducing CO2 and
hydrocarbons in the atmosphere by a fraction of a percent, then logically we
should be able to keep the planet warm by producing more of them.
We need to increase our production and use of fossil fuels, get those
industrial plants pumping out the smoke, and drive our cars more. I was
discussing this with my 90 year old mother over dinner the other day and she
offered to help. Mother walks a mile, twice around her block every morning for
exercise. To help avoid another ice age, she offered to drive her car twice
around the block every morning instead of walking. If everyone would do that,
then maybe we can keep the planet warm.
According to global warmites, we have the means to save the world from
another ice age. When they are forced to accept the truth that the Earth is
cooling, not warming, will they then reverse their Kyoto Treaty mindset and
encourage more industrialization and high powered cars to be built and driven?
Or will they continue to promote a lie in the interest of global socialism?
Perhaps theyíll come up with a scheme to promote socialism as a way of
preventing global cooling.
Donít let our government and the UN plunge us into another ice age and
destroy our way of life with their lies about global warming and climate change.
Donít let them limit their beliefs to Al Goreís silly movie and speeches. Insist
that they learn the truth about how global temperatures are regulated and
controlled, and give up the idea that the U.S. Government and the U.N. can do it